On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 02:08 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > I've made a mistake this is not logical but actual rate so it > theoretically we can go up to 600Mbs so it will make it 120 < 256. Um, should it be 1200 > 255? > But aren't we interested in MSC rate a packet was sent? NetBSD and wireshark support IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_XCHANNEL which does a better job to extend the IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_CHANNEL functions including per-channel power dbm, MCS rates, etc. Linux should catch up when we have 11n fully supported. Thanks, -yi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
