> > I'm just not sure why you'd want to. As far as I can the frames > already > > passed __ieee80211_rx(), no? Maybe only as part of the aggregation? > > No, not passed it yet, they are still queued for reordering, but as > aggregation is being tear down I am expected to drop the frames > that are still not in order. But haven't they passed through __ieee80211_rx() as the aggregate frame? > Again, if you see any performance issue with it, although this may > occur only once per session, do tell, if not, I would prefer to > leave it that way, as this will 1 - give more accurate statistics > of dropped frames, 2 - I don't want to drop frames in places > people will have trouble finding, other then the in the handlers. No I guess it's ok I'm just trying to understand it better. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
