On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 14:17 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > + /* If a forced rate is in effect, select it. */
> > > > + sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
> > > > + if (sdata->bss && sdata->bss->force_unicast_rateidx > -1)
> > > > + sel->rate = &mode->rates[sdata->bss->force_unicast_rateidx];
> > > > +
> > > > + /* If we haven't found the rate yet, ask the rate control algo. */
> > > > + if (!sel->rate)
> > > > + ref->ops->get_rate(ref->priv, dev, mode, skb, sel);
> > >
> > > Maybe after this we should insert
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(!sel->rate)) {
> > > WARN_ON(1);
> > > sel->rate = rate_lowest(...);
> > > }
> > >
> > > Not sure though.
> >
> > I don't think we need this. Rate control is supposed to select a rate,
> > if it doesn't know it can assign a fallback rate itself.
>
> Obviously. I just thought we could protect against buggy rate control
> algorithm code that way. Not really necessary though.
If it's buggy, it should be fixed. So it's actually better to fail
dramatically ;-)
Mattias
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
