On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 19:24 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > [comments welcome. I really need a refresher on what the frame formats > mean but I think I did the right thing with skb->protocol here, I also > think we had a bug with rfc2042 header frames bigger than 15xx bytes and > eth_type_trans()] I just discovered annex M to the 802.11 standard, will recheck with that in mind. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
