> There are not any new mac80211 patches in there yet -- does your fix > depend on a pending mac80211 patch? It shouldn't. There weren't any relevant patches to mac80211 that I'm aware of. > FWIW, I don't see anything obvious in a quick code inspection. Me neither. > I presume that Larry and Michael tested this on the previous iteration > of wireless-2.6 which was based on 2.6.24-rc3. Any chance that > something in the rc3->rc5 difference accounts for this? Probably. I think lockdep might tell you where the atomic was entered but I don't have it on this system. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
