> I'm fine with patches that are either specific to driver_devicescape.c > or are clearly not breaking other driver wrappers (or core hostapd > functionality) as long as they are somehow in sync with a commonly used > Linux kernel tree. At some point, I would like to limit this to proper > kernel releases, but for the time being, any development tree should be > fine taken into account the current state of the AP support. Great. I think all the remaining patches I have are specific to driver_nl80211.c (I think I sent you the rename patch, didn't I?) I'll send them to you as appropriate, I think the beaconing/station and eapol stuff is pretty well fleshed out right now. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
