On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:23 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > NACK. Which virtual interface should get this? wmaster sounds like the > > "obvious" candidate but we want to get rid of it ASAP. And the others > > ones are pretty wrong because you can, technically, have a wiphy without > > any virtual interfaces on it. > > > Just a thought. What if all virtual interfaces will quasi implements > it. It doesn't matter if all the interfaces answers the same. I think The True Linux Way (c) would be to have EEPROM support for devices (those that live in /sys/device) without tying it to network interfaces or cfg80211. See __ATTR in include/linux/device.h, although I'm not sure if attributes are suitable for EEPROM as is. Maybe EEPROM should even be a separate class of devices connected to other devices. Of course, the topic would be better suited for LKML. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
