On Dec 12, 2007 7:24 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [comments welcome. I really need a refresher on what the frame formats > mean but I think I did the right thing with skb->protocol here, I also > think we had a bug with rfc2042 header frames bigger than 15xx bytes and > eth_type_trans()] > > This cleans up the frame receive handling. After this patch > * EAPOL frames addressed to us or the EAPOL group address are > always accepted regardless of whether they are encrypted or not why? userspace (wap_supplicant) tryes to control this depending on the network settings. (I don't really know why thought) maybe it should be handled like drop_unencrypted with default to accept all? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
