> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:39:56 +0100 > Subject: Re: Misleading PCI id information on chipsets supported by ath5k > From: mrenzmann@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: jfrieben@xxxxxxxxxxx > CC: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ... > If at all, PCI IDs can be seen as evidence but should not be regarded > authoritative in terms of chipset identification. ath_info does a better > job here. > > Bye, Mike Sure, that's what I wrote in my last mail ".. either the PCI id is not an appropriate way to label whether a device is supported or not .." - which brings me back to my initial request to update the ath5k information page in order to account for this ambiguity. ~jf _________________________________________________________________ Importieren Sie ganz einfach Ihre E-Mail Adressen in den Messenger! http://messenger.live.de/community/neuekontakte_adressimport.html- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
