On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 13:23 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > [what happened here with all the gmane addresses??] > > > > Since iw_range is not packed, there are a few locations where there > > is some padding. You could quite easily shoehorn an 8 bit bitmask into > > the existing structure without impacting backward compatibility > > (unless userspace is using the padding for something). For example: > > Ouch. But possible since we cannot do this. Eh. I mean. Possible since we cannot expand the structure. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part