On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:51:20 +0100
Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static inline int rate_control_pid_r_to_i(struct rc_pid_rateinfo *r, int rate,
> > + int l)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < l; i++)
> > + if (r[i].index == rate)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + return i;
> > +}
>
> Isn't the store-direct-rinfo-indices approach nicer? Why did you decide
> for the index conversion function in favour of storing direct indices?
Yesterday there was a reason, now I just forgot it. If I can't recall about
it within tomorrow, I'll switch to the other approach. ;)
--
Ciao
Stefano
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
