> Chances are it does make progress however we may still have the > general wireless/IP stack alignment issue that we are still discussing. Yeah, it's still on my list. I'll make a patch to WARN_ON unaligned data in a packet... although this is a bit complicated. ath5k actually had a bug with this where they simply ignored the hardware-added padding in QoS frames initially which would result in "corrupted" data... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
