On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:52:09 -0500 Michael Wu <flamingice@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 26 November 2007 23:37:16 Andrew Morton wrote: > > Why not? > > > > Having very long and specific identifiers duplicated in two drivers is a > > daft situation. Unless they both drive the same hardware, which afaict > > they do not? > The radios and macs are very similar (radios could actually be the same, not > sure), with modifications to run on whatever bus they're on. That's why I'm > going to be merging the rtl8180_rtl8225.c and rtl8187_rtl8225.c into a single > piece of code. Besides that, rtl8187 != rtl8225 since rtl8187 is a mac and > rtl8225 is a radio. Replacing rtl8225z2 with rtl8187 makes no sense but is > okay temporarily to fix build issues in -mm. > Well I assumed that someone would be able to think up a better name than "rtl8187". I was thinking of using "foo" to make that clear... But whatever. I suppose we should mention allyesconfig in the file-which-nobody-reads. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
