> Yes, that would work too. I'm not entirely sure about the effect on > eapol handling but I'll sort that out with that patch then. At worst I > get to restructure the code instead of you :) Actually, what I did in that patch is move the eapol decision out of the port control function which is probably better. Anyway, if you can do the restructuring and make it work as it is now, I'll do the rest. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
