> If I understood correctly, the proposed change was removing 'capab' > information from scan results(?). If that is the case, that would break > wpa_supplicant network selection since there would be no information on > whether the network is using encryption or not (privacy flag) and > whether it is a BSS or an IBSS. Consequently, I obviously continue to > object this type of change as long as WE is used for getting scan > results. Well, wpa_supplicant currently works, right? And this code is never triggered before the change to remove scan_flags because scan_flags cannot be set. Hence, I don't see how wpa_supplicant can possibly need this information. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
