> Oops sorry, I have already took this remark out, it was just a reminder > for > me to ask you if you think that mac80211 should give the low-level > driver some kind of query option to its station table? It may save > double book keeping of station table to low-level driver? Does the driver actually need to do bookkeeping? I don't see why that would be necessary if the ucode does it. If the driver will actually need to do bookkeeping then I'm all for adding an iterator for the STAs in the style of the virtual interface iterator I just added. But I wouldn't want to add it if the driver doesn't need to do any bookkeeping (other than maybe the number of stations) anyway. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
