On Wednesday 07 November 2007 01:13:14 John W. Linville wrote: > "ssb: Fix initcall ordering" changes a subsys_initcall to an > fs_initcall. This seems like a bit of a hack, but it fixes a real > problem and I'm not sure what cleaner solution is either reasonable > or available. The comment in the patch explains the reasoning for this > somewhat unique situation. Well, ssb is not the only subsystem with this special requirement. Grep for fs_initcall. In my opinion we need another initcall to fix this issue. I think we need a post_subsys_initcall(). But that really is another issue that we can't decide in netdev. For now, this fix is harmless and fixes the bug. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
