On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 13:51 +0100, Holger Schurig wrote: > > The 2nd patch "libertas: move to uniform lbs_/LBS_ namespace" > > breaks the compile of if_sdio.c, so I had to drop it. I > > dropped "libertas: clean up association debug messages" as > > well. > > I didn't see an if_sdio.c in my tree when I made the patch. > > And I wont make a third patch. It's quite discouraging to send > things which don't get applied (for no known reasons) for more > than a week. And during that time they bitrot. Would the patch > have been applied timely, it would have worked in the first > place. This is the way things work. The patch clearly was not material for 2.6.24 given the timing. Therefore, it's 2.6.25. Therefore, since if_sdio.c was ready to go in _August_, it hit 2.6.24, but you didn't have it because your patch was based on 2.6.23, not 2.6.24-rc1. That's distributed development. If you want a feature, you have to keep coming back until it gets where you need to go, if you want the benefits of distributed development. > Also, changing all things wlan_XXX in libertas_XXX is soooo easy. > However, I won't do it. The one who originally asked for the > cleanup patch should do the work and have the patience to get > the patch through, I have real work to do. In any case, thanks for the work. I'll see if I can pick it up. Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html