On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:10:39PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:04 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > There's no reason to warn about an invalid AID field when the > > association was denied. > > I don't really see a reason to have this in stable, do we really want Perhaps not. I'm still not totally clear on the "stable" criteria (probably my own fault). Anyway, this probably got caught-up in a "what recent fixes still apply to 2.6.23" sweep. Still, I don't see why this wouldn't be desirable for someone running 2.6.23? > that? And if so, we should roll in the fix for the warning :) I was trying to "clear the baffles" before rolling-out the more recent fixes. If this patch isn't rejected for stable then it might be worth waiting for the warning fix patch pushed yesterday. John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
