On Thursday 25 October 2007 11:46:03 you wrote: > > + * @NL80211_ATTR_STA_SUPPORTED_RATES: supported rates, array of > > supported + * rates as defined by IEEE 802.11 7.3.2.2 but without the > > length + * restriction (at most %NL80211_MAX_SUPP_RATES). > > Is this necessary? Shouldn't we just embrace the supported rates of > the hardware? If cfg80211 is extended to have devices register their > hardware capabilities then we can take it from there perhaps ? > This is for the supported rates of the sta we want to TX to. Rate control needs to know what rates are valid for a particular sta. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
