On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 11:36 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > + NL80211_CMD_GET_BEACON, /* ? */ > + NL80211_CMD_SET_BEACON, > + NL80211_CMD_NEW_BEACON, /* ? */ > + NL80211_CMD_DEL_BEACON, /* ? */ As you can see, I currently only support SET_BEACON. DEL_BEACON might make sense as well, and NEW_BEACON could be used when no beacon is configured (SET_BEACON would fail in that case). Right now you can stop beaconing by removing the beacon head which admittedly is kinda nasty. If I did del_beacon/add_beacon then set_beacon would fail with no beacon head, is that better? Further thoughts? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part