NACK we'll mess things up because we use hw also for mac80211_hw, too much use of "hw" is not recommended (also used in function names etc, it'll be difficult to track things down if we go too far). On the cleanups i did in madwifi-svn i used the name ath5k_hw for the struct, i think also "ah" or "ahw" or "board" or "card" etc are more appropriate for use as a variable name (on my cleanups i left it as "hal"). Question: Since i don't know how things work, if i want to commit some patches should i wait for current patches to be commited on wireless-2.6 ? I have a patch series to commit about ath5k (my changes on madwifi-svn that weren't ported here) that include lots of cleanups and some hw.c updates. Against what code should i diff ??? Should i include current fixes along with mine (eg. Luis's fixes on base.c etc) ? -- GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-) Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
