On Friday 12 October 2007 22:09:38 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > b43 also has padding added on RX which we simply remove with a memmove() > > Umm, no, this is wrong, the padding is in another place. nevermind. i thought of this as an option as well. but isn't doing a memmove() quite inefficient? especially since we are dealing with QoS packets that might be important. another solution i thought of was signalling the mac80211 layer that we need padding which could then just adjust it's headerlen. but then different drivers might need different padding in different places (i don't know?). what do you think of this approach? bruno - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
