On Saturday 13 October 2007 20:38:43 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Larry Finger wrote: > > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/pio.h: In function 'b43_pio_write': > > > linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/pio.h:89: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb' > > > > > > linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy.c: In function 'b43_phy_write': > > > linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy.c:301: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb' > > > > > > linuxdrivers/net/wireless/b43/sysfs.c: In function 'b43_attr_interfmode_store': > > > linuxdrivers/net/wireless/b43/sysfs.c:147: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb' > > > > From the distribution list for this E-mail, I presume this error occurred for m68k. Is this correct? > > That's correct. > > > If so, I will probably need to prepare a similar patch for b43legacy. > > I had no problems compiling b43legacy on m68k, though. Probably > <linux/io.h> was included through some other include file. > Of course it's safer to always #include <linux/io.h> when using I/O. > > During linking, I did get a bunch of `undefined reference to `dma_*'' > errors, with both b43 and b43legacy (and a few other drivers). Probably > they need to depend on HAS_DMA. > I'll post separate patches for those after I've sorted them out. We could make the b43 and b43legacy DMA engine code depend on HAS_DMA then. So it can still be compiled with PIO. (Though, I don't know if anybody would put such a card into a machine without DMA, anyway). The DMA engine code is a seperate kconfig option. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
