On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:34 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Huh. Sorry about that. I had a patch like this initially but then wanted > to not clutter the code. I think we should instead remove the checks > from the actual decryption functions though. Mind making a patch for > that? Never mind. This looks better since it doesn't require rewriting half the crypto code. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
