On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:47 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > checkpatch.pl barks on this patch anyway, because of the > ridiculus 80 columns restriction it wants to impose. Should I > rephrase the patch because of this or just ignore this > checkpatch warning? Personally, I'd prefer it written as "extended booleans" anyway: + if (!pscancfgout || !pchantlvout || !pscanchanlist) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
