On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 15:37 -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> This doesn't sound very GPL to me, however, the twist is in main_usb.c:
Not really.
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> What do you think?
That declaring MODULE_LICENSE in a file that isn't licensed under GPL is
a violation of the kernel license.
johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
