On Thursday 20 September 2007, Larry Finger wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 September 2007 19:55:59 Larry Finger wrote: > >> Michael Buesch wrote: > >>> Also cleanup the code a bit and remove the inline. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> @@ -2214,7 +2229,7 @@ static int b43_chip_init(struct b43_wlde > >>> b43_radio_turn_on(dev); > >>> dev->radio_hw_enable = b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(dev); > >>> b43dbg(dev->wl, "Radio %s by hardware\n", <======================== > >>> - (dev->radio_hw_enable == 0) ? "disabled" : "enabled"); > >>> + dev->radio_hw_enable ? "enabled" : "disabled"); > >> Shouldn't this one be b43info rather than b43dbg? > > > > No, I think it's really only interesting to see if it changed > > in operation. > > If it doesn't work, people will press their rfkill buttons > > before even noticing this message on init. :) > > I have a suggestion to simplify the whole business of hardware radio control. Why don't we > unconditionally set radio_hw_enable to one here and dispense with this message? That way, people > without the rfkill switch will never see a message and those that do will only get messages if their > switch is off, or if it is toggled. Great idea, Larry! I will implement that in an additional patch later. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
