On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > ACK -- driver developers use this just to save themselves a few lines > from calling pci_resource_start() and friends. How about having an > inline which does what pci_iomap() does except it doesn't call > ioport_map() ? I am just not sure where this would go.. I'm not understanding what the problem is? Why don't these people just use "ioread*()/iowrite*()"? In other words, the whole point of *not* using "read*/write*()" is that you get a whole slew of much nicer interfaces. So can people explain this fundamental issue? Why do people insist on using the old interfaces (and matching them with the new setup)? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
