On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 17:20 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > It is my best intention yet first we need native interface which make > in turn problems in eb tables. So it is a long shot. Ok. We've managed long enough without it so I guess we can wait :) > I wouldn't appreciate this at all. 11n is major feature of our NIC. > Major obstacle in finally pushing 11n is constant code base change of > iwlwifi. This is already 4th code base. The latest was because the > driver didn't look nice enough, what an engineering reason! In the > bottom line we are hunting our own tail for wrong reasons Well, I believe that there are bad layering violations in your current driver, namely looking at the packets mac80211 sends, doing 11N manipulations and everything in the driver and duplicating the sta_info stuff because mac80211 happens to be missing a few hooks. If you think those are "wrong reasons" that's fine with me. Personally, I'm just raising these points and marking them down as "against merging as-is". If others don't care about them, that's ok with me. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
