Whie the license clarification is much appreciated, adding GPL'd code to this driver is a slap in the face for BSD developers. Adding code under a more restrictive licence than the code was originally released; does that really fit in with the principles of the FSF, the GPL, Linux, or the hacking community in general? Regardless of whether this is Microsoft taking BSD code and making it totally unfree, or you guys taking it and adding things which cannot be taken back by the original author, the result is the same: changes that don't go back to the author. Isn't this one of the primary goals of the GPL, so changes remain as free as the original? Please think about that for a minute. Not from your point of view as a Linux coder, but from your point of view simply as a coder. Thanks. -- jakemsr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
