On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 06:54 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > I understand that. But at the time I did it, I wasn't even sure that > the mac80211 conversion is possible. I wanted to have a solid base > before starting the risky conversion. [...] > The patches I have sent were not meant to be reviewed in this list, > since I expected the latest version to be imported as is. But I think > it's still better to send the patches separately rather than a single > patch. If nothing else, the separate patches could receive some useful > comments. Oh sure, it's fine to do this first, just wondered if you were now spending time on it erroneously :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
