On 8/28/07, Larry Finger <larry.finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:10 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:58:52AM -0400, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >>> -ath5k-objs = ath5k_base.o ath5k_hw.o ath5k_regdom.o > >>> +ath5k-objs = ath5k_base.o ath5k_hw.o ath5k_regdom.o \ > >>> + ath5k_hw_phy.o ath5k_hw_inivals.o > >> And while I'm at nitpicking :) > >> > >> ath5k_hw_phy.o should probably be ath5k_phy.o by conventions used by > >> most drivers and ath5k_hw_inivals.o mights aswell be something like > >> ath5k_init.o > > > > While we're at names... I personally much prefer a new directory ath5k > > and then ath5k/hw.c etc. but it seems I'm pretty alone in that. But here > > we already have at least four files now. > > I agree with you. If a wireless driver takes more than one .c and one .h file, it belongs in its own > directory, and the file names stripped of any driver prefix. Not only are the file names simpler, > but Makefile and Kconfig in wireless benefits. NACK, I don't agree with this patch. The ath5k_regdom.* files will be gone soon anyway and don't see the reason to split the files even more. Now iwlwifi... -- that could is own directory IMHO :) Luis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
