On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 21:04 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > First one > > is useful should one be interested in WFA certifications tests. > > That should, imho, rather live in debugfs. Somebody doing certification > tests ought to be able to enable debugfs on their system. Sure, that's fine. I was mainly objecting for the part of completely removing the code (i.e., not just the ioctl). I don't really care how this command goes through, but anyway, I would agree that debugfs would be more reasonable location now that it is available and already being used elsewhere in mac80211. > > Scan > > flags can be useful in filtering out scan results in cases where there > > are huge numbers of APs around. > > Plan has it that the new cfg80211 API for scanning allows scanning for > things rather than filtering the results after the fact, e.g. (like > iwlist already supports) scanning for a particular SSID. I suppose > hardware designs like iwlwifi could make much better use of that than > mac80211 itself though. OK. I was more commenting on part of removing functionality, not on the removal of ioctl itself. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html