On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:18 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > There is no point in trying to handle source MAC address based VLANs in > the wireless stack, something like "smacvlan" modeled after macvlan > should be sufficient. Whoops. I only forgot the use with encryption. Please consider this patch withdrawn, at least until I see clearer through that crypto issue. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
