On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:43 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > Just like ieee80211_msg_sta_not_assoc, this one is a useful notification > and I would rather not see it being removed. Consequently, I did not > apply this. I would be much more open to changing this notification to > use some other mechanism if there is a reason to get rid of > ieee80211_msg_* types, but just removing this because the code is > currently #if 0'ed in hostapd is not a reason I would support. Same as with the other one, I'd like to get rid of the ieee80211_msg_* stuff with the hacked-up prism2 monitor mode header. Again, here I've extended the TODO item to cover both sides, where the implementation ought to be in nl80211. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
