On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 15:08 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) > + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_REQ_TX_STATUS; > + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_DO_NOT_ENCRYPT) > + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_DO_NOT_ENCRYPT; > + if (control->flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_REQUEUE) > + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_REQUEUE; > + if (control->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_MGMT) > + pkt_data->flags |= IEEE80211_TXPD_MGMT_IFACE; This looks weird. Can't we just use the same flags? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
