On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 13:58 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > Isn't the removal of management interface a bit premature? I didn't > see any proposal how to move management packets to the application > level? If not I would prefer eapol packets be treated on management > path. No data should be received on data interface till security > negotiation is done. Have you read the patch or are you just ranting? I'm guessing the latter? The patch didn't remove the management interface at all. Besides, what point is there in not allowing EAPOL packets through? They are fundamentally data packets so they belong onto the AP mode ethernet framed device, and they won't be interpreted by any other application. You'll have to come up with better reasons than "I prefer" blabla. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
