On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:45:06PM +0900, Masakazu Mokuno wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:37:29 -0700 > Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Testing with SIOCGIWSTATS or SIOCGIWPRIV would narrow down to > > only the pointer problem, and the kernel fix should work with both old > > and new version of the Wireless Tools. It's simple to test, either you > > are getting valid data or garbage, the only issue is that some drivers > > may be returning garbage for those calls. > > As I'm outside of the firewall of the company this week, I'll test in > the next week. > > I think it is sufficient to see these ioctls work, using 'iwpriv > <interface>' for SIOCGIWPRIV and 'iwconfig <interface>' for SIOCGIWSTAT. > Is that right? Correct. You should check what to expect to make sure the returned data is valid. > Anything to add more? > > For the 'old version' of wirelesstools, which version should I use? > wirelesstools 28? Yes, v28 is great, unless John has a specific version in mind. > regards > > -- > Masakazu MOKUNO Jean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
