Jiri Benc wrote: > What I'm proposing to do now? > - Throw away current wireless-dev and start it from scratch from the > current vanilla. > - Apply patches from up-dev branch of mac80211 tree. > - Apply all drivers. That's a bit tricky and I'm aware that some people > won't agree but I think it's easiest to apply them as one big patch > for each (that's the form in which they will be submitted to vanilla > anyway). They have been moved out of mac80211 directory recently so > perhaps it's a good time to do that. I can help with creating such > patches. Do we really need two git trees in the future? And do we need all those different branches in a public tree? I suggest that we go back now to a single wireless tree, that should have only those three branches: master - latest tree put together by John up - tree with patches going into mainline up-2.6.x.y - bug fixes against last released mainline Will John have more branches in its private tree? Sure! Will the wireless developers have their own public trees? Certainly! But I really question the value of two wireless trees with a larger number of branches. -- Uli Kunitz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
