On 7/26/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tomas Winkler wrote: > I know you've asked us to review the already submitted 11n/HT patches. > I'm suggesting that we just patch over them otherwise we lost driver > stability and delay the whole process even more. I'm not happy with > this solution myself but to bring the complete solution at once will > make us silent for another period. What do you mean, "patch over them"? If this means dual solutions for the same problem, it's not very enticing.
No, I mean gradually cleaning up the patches. Theoretically first I want to change data structures, then the interfaces, and finally cleaning up flows. but in bottom line I cannot afford to lost stability of the whole project for the period it takes to fix, currently driver works. Or first solution was narrowed to STA and we want to make it works better in IBSS and AP mode as well. I guess the community doesn't really care about our internal constrains but we all live in time and space. Tomas
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html