Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/2] bcm43xx-mac80211: Fix reported rx frequency and channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 20 July 2007 18:58:24 Larry Finger wrote:
> Andy Green wrote:
> > 
> > Understood, that is why I consider it a bad thing that functionality
> > that can be done in the mac80211 driver is pushed into the binary-only
> > firmware when there is a choice (otherwise known as "paranoia", apparently).
> 
> Unfortunately, that is a necessary result of this type of reverse-engineering. If Broadcom put some 
> function in the firmware, we have to leave it there as we have no idea what would break.
> 
> > However you stripped some quoting from Michael:
> > 
> > ''But it is actually no problem in reality, as the use-it-or-die
> > firmware doesn't have this problem. So if someone uses another
> > firmware than the one we suggest, he will probably run into more
> > problems, as well.
> > The fix is called: Use the correct firmware.
> > For now, at least.''
> > 
> > I would summarize this that Michael is telling me one pariticular
> > version of firmware - "use it or die firmware" - is especially
> > blessed/correct.  It might be an idea to let people know they have
> > strayed from the dependency of the required firmware version in dmesg if
> > indeed there is an effective dependency of the driver on it.
> 
> It isn't that it is blessed or correct, but that it has been tested. Your version has not. Who knows 
> what else might have changed? Once we know the version with the different behavior, a warning 
> message can be prepared. I don't think anyone knew about this problem until you submitted your patch.

People don't read dmesg. Adding a "This firmware is unsupported"
would have no effect.
I experience same thing for the "bcm43xx-does-not-support-v3-issue".
There is a clear error message saying what to do exactly. And _still_
people mail me asking what this message means.

The use-or-die firmware is here:
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/bcm43xx

> > Can I still get the firmware version from fwcutter if I don't have the
> > original Windows binary the firmware came from?
> 
> AFAIK, fwcutter can only get the version from the foreign driver. It can be gotten from the dmesg 
> output of your inlaws computer, or if you have the extracted firmware files here, you can bundle 
> them up and email them to me privately.

People don't read dmesg.
q.e.d. ;)

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux