On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:15:32 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > > Jiri Benc wrote: > > > [removed netdev, no reason for sending this there] > > > > Was I wrong for sending the patch there, or was it just your ACK that > > you didn't think would be relevant on netdev? > > linux-wireless mailinglist was created to lower traffic at netdev. I > understand that in the way that wireless patches should be sent to > linux-wireless only; they will be sent to nedev by John when he's asking > for a pull. But I'm not sure about that (Cc:ing John), my comment was more > about my ack. I think linux-wireless is sufficient, especially for small and/or isolated patches. But there is no real harm in including netdev, especially for patches with broader impact. For example, if Zhu Yi and PJ had chosen to push the multiqueue stuff on wireless first then it would certainly have been appropriate to copy netdev. I guess it is just a judgment call -- if your patch merits broader review, then copy netdev as well. Hth! (I doubt if it does!) John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
