On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 22:57 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 09 July 2007 22:17:35 Andy Green wrote: > > Hi folks - > > > > Is 222 permissions on /sys/class/ieee80211/phy*/add_iface and > > remove_iface really okay, or should it perhaps be 220? > > > > --w--w--w- 1 root root 0 2007-07-09 21:11 add_iface > > --w--w--w- 1 root root 4096 2007-07-09 21:12 remove_iface > > IMO the file-permissions are correct, _but_ the following should > be added to _store_remove_iface() and _store_add_iface(): > > if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN)) > return -EPERM; Uh huh, yes, of course. Do you have a patch? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
