On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 06:50 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 01:36:21AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Is there any documentation for the arguments to ieee80211_radar_status? > > Apparently not. It looks like it was only used for reporting a detected > radar and none of the arguments were really used, i.e., it is just a > callback from low-level driver to notify if a radar was detected on the > current channel. Huh, ok, but why were the arguments added then. Oh well, doesn't matter much. > > When moving to nl80211, this shall be handled there, but since we don't > > have anybody using it right now we might as well kill it off completely > > until we need it (again). > > This function is called by low-level driver and it would not have > anything to do with nl80211.. The ieee80211_msg_radar type message to > user space would be the one that would need to be replaced. Yeah, true, but unless I see something using it I don't think I can properly define the semantics for the nl80211 message, and thus I can't define the semantics for cfg80211, and then not for the function that the low-level driver calls... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
