Hi, > I think it is cleaner to define a parameter called BAND which can take > values 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz and so on. Then, the combination of BAND and > CHANNEL will uniquely define the operating frequency. <phymode stuff snipped> > I wasn't sure if this has already been thought about. I look forward to > being educated if I am missing something. Good point. I hadn't really considered this but a/g or n cards really make it necessary to distinguish here, and regulatory stuff would also benefit from defining it that way. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
