On Tuesday 12 June 2007 13:35, Larry Finger wrote: > Michael Wu wrote: > > One last thing - max_ratectrl_rateidx should be set to -1 to indicate no > > maximum. Not doing this will cause problems when switching from one hw > > mode to another with a different number of rates. > > I don't understand this last part. If we use the upper-limit form of the > rate command, isn't that indicated to the rate-setting routine by having > max_ratectrl_index set to the upper limit, and force_unicast_rateidx set to > -1? Yes. However, when you're not setting the upper limit, max_ratectrl_index needs to be set to -1. The current code sets max_ratectrl_index to the highest rate index it can find to configure full auto rate selection or fixed rate when it should set -1 instead. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgpYOK19TukLX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
