Quoting "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx>:
A bigger issue for users is support. As you very well know reverse
engineering is a long tedious process; we are essentially doomed to
reverse engineering wireless drivers for some wireless devices where
regulatory compliance sits in the driver due to vendor fears on legal
liability. I'm not saying their fears are justified by any means I'm
just saying those fears do exist by some vendors and unfortunately we
suffer the consequences. So if we can do some sort of best effort,
perhaps we can steer some vendors to support us.
I would say that we should do our best in supporting users instead.
Furthermore, I understand your concerns, but:
1) I think that a weak regulatory domain support (such as commented
defines in the mac80211 code) is sufficient to claim we comply with
regulatory domains, while avoiding to hassle users.
2) We won't get any vendor to support us thanks to regulatory
compliance. There are just some weird vendors such as Broadcom and
some friendly vendors such as Realtek: it's unrealistic that vendors
such as Broadcom would ever change their mind. You may say my point is
short-sighted, but I really can't think that we can steer a vendor to
support us just by complying to regulatory domains: it looks clear to
me that Broadcom and other weird vendors such as TI are just
ridicolously trying to protect IP. Or are you talking about the
almost-friendly vendors like Intel?
3) The GPL license, in my humble opinion, aims at the most possible
freedom. I don't care if vendors support us if we don't aim at this.
However, as you can see, I CC'ed Theo DeRaadt, who, being an expert
about these issues, will sure provide us with the best advice about
what to do.
--
Ciao
Stefano
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
