On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:09 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > I did the test with an 2.6.22-rc3-git4 kernel and the p54 driver built > > > external as module. > > > > Can you look at iperf to figure out, whether it does some weird timer > > stuff (high frequency interval timer or such) ? Either check the code or > > strace it. > > It is the receiver doing a tight loop doing gettimeofday/recv calls. > > > sendto(-1227715616, 0xc, 3085438964, 0, {...}, 3067249832) = 0 > gettimeofday({1180973726, 981615}, NULL) = 0 > gettimeofday({1180973726, 981751}, NULL) = 0 > futex(0x8055c64, 0x5 /* FUTEX_??? */, 1) = 1 > futex(0x8055c90, FUTEX_WAKE, 1) = 0 > recv(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\23\211\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\364"..., 8192, 0) = 8192 > gettimeofday({1180973726, 982754}, NULL) = 0 > recv(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\23\211\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\364"..., 8192, 0) = 8192 > gettimeofday({1180973726, 983790}, NULL) = 0 Well, gettimeofday() is not affected by the highres code, but > nanosleep({0, 0}, NULL) = 0 > nanosleep({0, 0}, NULL) = 0 is. The nanosleep call with a relative timeout of 0 returns immediately with highres enabled, while it sleeps at least until the next tick arrives when highres is off. Are there more of those stupid sleeps in the code ? tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html