On Sunday 27 May 2007 21:25:17 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > 2.6.22-rc3: > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 46557 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001 > [ 5] 0.0-60.4 sec 58.9 MBytes 8.18 Mbits/sec > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 51633 > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 7.27 MBytes 967 Kbits/sec Why do we have two different measurements here? Is one TX and one RX? Which one? > koala:~# ping -c10 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.243 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.234 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.235 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.230 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.317 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.232 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.232 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.228 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8997ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.228/0.242/0.317/0.031 ms > > System responsiveness was the same as with 2.6.21.1. > > wget got 11.23M/s, again same as 2.6.21.1. > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 42198 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001 > [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 402 MBytes 56.1 Mbits/sec > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 48598 > [ 4] 0.0-63.0 sec 177 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec So with -mm (with ssb) you actually get better performace then with plain 2.6.22-rc3? Can you elaborate a bit more about what you get an what you expect on which kernel? -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
